×

News publications and other organizations are encouraged to reuse Direct Relief-published content for free under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International), given the republisher complies with the requirements identified below.

When republishing:

  • Include a byline with the reporter’s name and Direct Relief in the following format: "Author Name, Direct Relief." If attribution in that format is not possible, include the following language at the top of the story: "This story was originally published by Direct Relief."
  • If publishing online, please link to the original URL of the story.
  • Maintain any tagline at the bottom of the story.
  • With Direct Relief's permission, news publications can make changes such as localizing the content for a particular area, using a different headline, or shortening story text. To confirm edits are acceptable, please check with Direct Relief by clicking this link.
  • If new content is added to the original story — for example, a comment from a local official — a note with language to the effect of the following must be included: "Additional reporting by [reporter and organization]."
  • If republished stories are shared on social media, Direct Relief appreciates being tagged in the posts:
    • Twitter (@DirectRelief)
    • Facebook (@DirectRelief)
    • Instagram (@DirectRelief)

Republishing Images:

Unless stated otherwise, images shot by Direct Relief may be republished for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution, given the republisher complies with the requirements identified below.

  • Maintain correct caption information.
  • Credit the photographer and Direct Relief in the caption. For example: "First and Last Name / Direct Relief."
  • Do not digitally alter images.

Direct Relief often contracts with freelance photographers who usually, but not always, allow their work to be published by Direct Relief’s media partners. Contact Direct Relief for permission to use images in which Direct Relief is not credited in the caption by clicking here.

Other Requirements:

  • Do not state or imply that donations to any third-party organization support Direct Relief's work.
  • Republishers may not sell Direct Relief's content.
  • Direct Relief's work is prohibited from populating web pages designed to improve rankings on search engines or solely to gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
  • Advance permission is required to translate Direct Relief's stories into a language different from the original language of publication. To inquire, contact us here.
  • If Direct Relief requests a change to or removal of republished Direct Relief content from a site or on-air, the republisher must comply.

For any additional questions about republishing Direct Relief content, please email the team here.

Patient Care at Community Health Centers Rivals Private Practices, Study Finds

News

By Andrew Schroeder

 

The news on quality of care in the U.S. healthcare safety net is surprisingly good, according to a recent study by Dr. Randall Stafford M.D., Ph.D. of Stanford University and colleagues from the University of California, San Francisco.

Despite treating significantly more “medically and socially complex patients” than those seen by private providers, community health centers actually provide “better care than do private practices,” says the study published in the American Journal of Preventative Medicine.

These findings are important as safety-net health facilities, such as the Federally Qualified Health Centers studied, are poised to play a critical role in providing care for the estimated 32 million uninsured persons set to gain coverage by 2019 through the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Click to see how community health centers bested private practices on six measures in the study.

The study is a cross-sectional examination of 73,074 patient visits between 2006 and 2008, derived from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS).

Stafford’s team assessed how well physicians followed professional and federal guidelines for 18 health measures ranging from management of chronic illness to preventive counseling, diagnostics and appropriate prescription for the elderly.

Physicians at community health centers bested their private counterparts on six measures, fared worse on one (diet counseling for at-risk adolescents) and were roughly equal on the remaining 11 measures.

“These are centers where physicians are not as profit-driven and many have incentives more in line with providing quality care,” said Dr. Stafford.

Direct Relief USA works with more than 1,000 clinic partners across the country, more than half of which are Federally Qualified Health Centers like the ones studied. The report confirms that the patients Direct Relief’s clinic partners serve can access quality care from what many acknowledge is an already-strained network caring for a disproportionate share of socially vulnerable and chronically ill patients.

Giving is Good Medicine

You don't have to donate. That's why it's so extraordinary if you do.