News publications and other organizations are encouraged to reuse Direct Relief-published content for free under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International), given the republisher complies with the requirements identified below.

When republishing:

  • Include a byline with the reporter’s name and Direct Relief in the following format: "Author Name, Direct Relief." If attribution in that format is not possible, include the following language at the top of the story: "This story was originally published by Direct Relief."
  • If publishing online, please link to the original URL of the story.
  • Maintain any tagline at the bottom of the story.
  • With Direct Relief's permission, news publications can make changes such as localizing the content for a particular area, using a different headline, or shortening story text. To confirm edits are acceptable, please check with Direct Relief by clicking this link.
  • If new content is added to the original story — for example, a comment from a local official — a note with language to the effect of the following must be included: "Additional reporting by [reporter and organization]."
  • If republished stories are shared on social media, Direct Relief appreciates being tagged in the posts:
    • Twitter (@DirectRelief)
    • Facebook (@DirectRelief)
    • Instagram (@DirectRelief)

Republishing Images:

Unless stated otherwise, images shot by Direct Relief may be republished for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution, given the republisher complies with the requirements identified below.

  • Maintain correct caption information.
  • Credit the photographer and Direct Relief in the caption. For example: "First and Last Name / Direct Relief."
  • Do not digitally alter images.

Direct Relief often contracts with freelance photographers who usually, but not always, allow their work to be published by Direct Relief’s media partners. Contact Direct Relief for permission to use images in which Direct Relief is not credited in the caption by clicking here.

Other Requirements:

  • Do not state or imply that donations to any third-party organization support Direct Relief's work.
  • Republishers may not sell Direct Relief's content.
  • Direct Relief's work is prohibited from populating web pages designed to improve rankings on search engines or solely to gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
  • Advance permission is required to translate Direct Relief's stories into a language different from the original language of publication. To inquire, contact us here.
  • If Direct Relief requests a change to or removal of republished Direct Relief content from a site or on-air, the republisher must comply.

For any additional questions about republishing Direct Relief content, please email the team here.

The Affordable Care Act: Safety Net Split along Medicaid Lines


Community Health

Nonprofit community health centers and clinics that provide preventive and primary healthcare services for 24 million people – or one in 13 persons in the U.S. – report that the first year of the Affordable Care Act’s implementation had uneven effects, particularly between facilities in Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states.

The findings were released today by Direct Relief in The State of the Safety Net 2014, an annual report that examines issues and trends within the extensive network of nonprofit, community-based health centers and clinics, which are the principal point of access to healthcare and the medical home for persons with low incomes, without health insurance, and among the country’s most vulnerable.  Such facilities include Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), nonprofit community-based health clinics, and free and charitable clinics.

Nonprofit safety net health centers and clinics are licensed in different states that have differing reporting requirements, which presents a challenge for analysis of facility-level data across all states.  FQHCs are a notable exception, because each is required annually to submit information to the federal government in addition to that required by the state in which it operates.

Drawing insights from both the most recent FQHC data and nationwide surveys of safety net providers – this year’s report reveals four recurring threads pertaining to the ACA’s initial and anticipated impact on the nonprofit health centers and community clinics that comprise, in large part, the nation’s health safety net:

The need for charitable health care remains. There will continue to be gaps in coverage for immigrants (documented and undocumented) and those who will otherwise fall through the cracks. Under any immediate scenario, states that have chosen not to expand Medicaid will continue to have higher levels of people who are uninsured than in the expansion states.

“The undocumented won’t quality for the exchanges, and they won’t even qualify for Medicaid, so I still think that our 25 percent uninsured rate will stay relatively constant, at least until some of the immigration debates are ultimately decided among Congress,” said Sean Granahan, President and general counsel of The Floating Hospital in Long Island City, N.Y.

Insurance alone does not guarantee access to high-quality care. Unease exists throughout the safety net over its ability to meet the demand for services among the newly insured, which dramatically outpaces the supply of health facilities and health professionals.

“Doctors are slowly not taking Medicare and Medicaid patients and I don’t know what we’re going to do because they’re going to have insurance, or Medicare, Medicaid, and as they get it, they’re not going to be able to utilize it because I don’t see a lot of new doctors coming on,” said Judy Jones, Executive Director, Bethel Free Health Clinic, Inc., Biloxi, Miss.

Geography matters. Geographic unevenness is amplified by the unevenness of the insurance exchanges (federal and state), in the varying public health and economic conditions across the country, and even in the differential risk of natural disasters in places where the law’s outcomes are as yet unknown.

“We know a little over 90,000 people in Oklahoma County are uninsured and have a household income at 200 percent Federal Poverty Level,” said Pam Cross Cupit, Executive Director, Health Alliance for the Uninsured,Oklahoma City, Okla.  “We were really hopeful that if even a third of them were able to move onto Medicaid and have a payment source that it would make a huge difference in our workload. That’s not happening.  Unfortunately, whereas we thought things might be improving for our population, it’s not going to improve very much.”

“I think the ACA will help people have access to specialists that previously they did not have access to,” said Barb Tylenda, Executive Director, Health Care Network, Racine, Wis.

Momentous changes yet to come. The shifting landscape of insurance coverage and health providers that treat low income patients is creating a more complex health care safety net.

“Will it improve patients overnight? No. I think it’s going to take several years till we can really say having access increases or does not increase the health status,” said Dan Ahearn, CEO, Community Health Alliance, Reno, Nev.

The full State of the Safety Net 2014 report is available here: https://www.directrelief.org/2014/11/state-safety-net-2014-2/


Giving is Good Medicine

You don't have to donate. That's why it's so extraordinary if you do.