News publications and other organizations are encouraged to reuse Direct Relief-published content for free under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International), given the republisher complies with the requirements identified below.

When republishing:

  • Include a byline with the reporter’s name and Direct Relief in the following format: "Author Name, Direct Relief." If attribution in that format is not possible, include the following language at the top of the story: "This story was originally published by Direct Relief."
  • If publishing online, please link to the original URL of the story.
  • Maintain any tagline at the bottom of the story.
  • With Direct Relief's permission, news publications can make changes such as localizing the content for a particular area, using a different headline, or shortening story text. To confirm edits are acceptable, please check with Direct Relief by clicking this link.
  • If new content is added to the original story — for example, a comment from a local official — a note with language to the effect of the following must be included: "Additional reporting by [reporter and organization]."
  • If republished stories are shared on social media, Direct Relief appreciates being tagged in the posts:
    • Twitter (@DirectRelief)
    • Facebook (@DirectRelief)
    • Instagram (@DirectRelief)

Republishing Images:

Unless stated otherwise, images shot by Direct Relief may be republished for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution, given the republisher complies with the requirements identified below.

  • Maintain correct caption information.
  • Credit the photographer and Direct Relief in the caption. For example: "First and Last Name / Direct Relief."
  • Do not digitally alter images.

Direct Relief often contracts with freelance photographers who usually, but not always, allow their work to be published by Direct Relief’s media partners. Contact Direct Relief for permission to use images in which Direct Relief is not credited in the caption by clicking here.

Other Requirements:

  • Do not state or imply that donations to any third-party organization support Direct Relief's work.
  • Republishers may not sell Direct Relief's content.
  • Direct Relief's work is prohibited from populating web pages designed to improve rankings on search engines or solely to gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
  • Advance permission is required to translate Direct Relief's stories into a language different from the original language of publication. To inquire, contact us here.
  • If Direct Relief requests a change to or removal of republished Direct Relief content from a site or on-air, the republisher must comply.

For any additional questions about republishing Direct Relief content, please email the team here.

Ebola Crisis Mapping Lands Direct Relief in Fast Company’s Top 10



The Ebola outbreak began in December of 2013 in a small village near the border between Guinea and Liberia. From that remote epicenter emerged a pattern of infection that blazed across parts of six countries in West Africa, sparking a number of isolated cases in Europe and the United States. Now, as the tide turns against the virus, with reported cases slowing dramatically, it’s worth reflecting on what made a difference in the response and what will most impact the long-term recovery and rebuilding of West Africa’s health systems.

Among many factors, Direct Relief’s inclusion among Fast Company’s 10 most innovative not-for-profit companies suggests that part of the answer may well be “better maps.”

Direct Relief began mapping the spread of Ebola cases in April, 2014 as it became apparent that the case rates were increasing faster than in past outbreaks. Using open data compiled from World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) sources, as well as reports from partners like HealthMap.org, we started to see the virus moving into areas where long-standing local partners were operating health programs. This information helped inform where early supply shipments could be targeted. Then, as the case counts mounted over the summer and dramatically larger response efforts were assembled in the early fall, those same maps became living records of where epidemiology met humanitarian response. Questions like, “Where are the hotspots?” and “Where is the virus moving?” could be paired with questions like, “Where are the supply shortages the worst?” “Where are health facilities still functioning?” and “Where has aid that we’ve sent been received?”

What Difference Does a Map Make?

Mapping, in other words, connects different pieces of a complex landscape in such a way that each piece informs and deepens the understanding of the others. Without knowing where case counts are likely to increase, and where those increasing case counts might be the result of things like the absence of sufficient medical supplies, it’s difficult to fill the most significant gaps in supply. Without the ability to demonstrate where aid has gone and what good it did, it’s difficult to assure donors and other key stakeholders of the efficacy of their donations. And without close attention to changing dynamics and needs at the community level, it’s difficult to strategize how to improve health systems moving forward. Fortunately, Direct Relief and its partner organizations are well placed to use geography and data analysis to improve the quality of response activities.

An illustrative example of such a partnership involves Direct Relief’s collaboration with the Liberian community health worker (CHW) organization Last Mile Health. The model which makes Last Mile Health effective involves tracking a range of health conditions, including possible Ebola exposure, at the household level. This allows teams of community health workers to target specific interventions and analyze the distribution of conditions and needs.

Direct Relief delivered a number of GPS units to Last Mile Health. The units helped facilitate real-time messaging from remote areas, which allowed some of the first maps of Last Mile’s catchment areas to be built. As Last Mile’s coverage area expanded with the Ebola epidemic, Direct Relief and Last Mile connected with teams from Humanitarian OpenStreetMap. Together, the organizations worked to establish the basis for a dynamic local-area epidemiology by mapping every individual household structure tied to CHW outreach efforts. As a result, these maps will provide crucial information infrastructure for any future health system in Liberia.

The Ebola outbreak reveals, once again, that better maps provide better insights into how to provide better care and more resilient systems for the people who need it most. That’s an insight that needs to carry over more frequently into the everyday work of building better health systems everywhere around the world so that events like what has transpired over the past year in West Africa is less likely to happen again.

Giving is Good Medicine

You don't have to donate. That's why it's so extraordinary if you do.